This is a ranty rant
Apr. 10th, 2010 10:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(Much credit goes to
angearia, for watching this with me and sharing in my capslocky rage. She definitely called about half the stuff in this rant.)
So... remember how last week I complained about how Bones kind of sucks? Well, I posted it on my RL blog and one of my friends commented to say, "Just you wait until tonight's "Bones". This one'll throw you almost completely. I thought it was one of their best." Well, I just watched it, and all I can say is, "ORLY?"
Holy God, where to begin? First, let's just get this out of the way. Why does Booth have Don Draper hair? I realize it's a flashback episode, but it's not the 1960s, right?
So, we find out that Booth has a gambling problem. WHAT? Why has this never come up before, like, I don't know, in all the conversations he had with Jared about alcoholism and addiction?? Why have we never seen Booth seem to have an addictive personality - to gambling or anything else - during the entire course of the show? Maybe because they only made it up just now, so that Sweets could say, "You're the gambler," to get him to make a move with Brennan? *eyeroll* Have I mentioned how much I hate retcons that throw out important parts of canon solely for the sake of a joke or a clever reference?
And then we see how all the other characters met. Oh, how cleverly ironic, Hodgins and Zack hated each other before they started working together! *eyeroll* (However, I will take any excuse to have Zack back. I miss him so much!) I was also under the impression that Brennan and Angela had known each other a lot longer than just a year when the show started. But apparently they'd only met a month before this case? Because of course there has to be a "how the team got together" story that all happens during a single case.
And then there's a double error with Brennan and Cam. They quite obviously met for the first time in the first episode of season 2. I quote:
BOOTH: Don't call me Seeley. Dr. Brennan, Dr. Saroyan. You two know each other, huh?
BRENNAN: No.
CAM: No.
BOOTH: Uh-oh.
"Uh-oh" is right, buddy. Because somehow we have them meeting not once, but TWICE before that, because in this flashback, Cam says, "Didn't I meet you at some conference?"
And it doesn't end there! Caroline Julian ALSO apparently met Brennan for the first time twice. From season 1:
BOOTH: Hey, Temperance Brennan, Caroline Julian. She's your lawyer. (they shake hands) She's from the U.S. Attorney's Office. She's the best there is.
DETECTIVE HARDING: You found a prosecutor to defend her? Interesting tactic.
BRENNAN: I've told Detective Harding everything I know so far.
CAROLINE JULIAN: She's a fool. You didn't tell me she's a fool.
BOOTH: Look, she's a brilliant forensic anthropologist.
(Random sidebar of awesome: "Right now, it just looks like a sadistic children's book.")
And why doesn't Brennan know what the word "squint" means in the pilot if Booth called her that during this case? Also, in the pilot, Booth said that in their previous case, Brennan provided him with a description of the murder weapon and the murderer by just looking at autopsy x-rays. Which is... not this case. Oh, and remember how Brennan had to, like, beg Booth to let her go out in the field with him at first? And yet here he's all, "Let's go! Chop chop!"
And then the cherry on this sundae of suck: this is supposed to be a flashback to the first time Booth and Bones worked together. Except the two of them act the way they do NOW, not the way they did five years ago when the show started. It's the most bizarre mix of nostalgia and trying too hard to push the Booth/Brennan relationship. Do they not realize that all the flirting and the KISSING and the ALMOST HAVING SEX makes it absolutely absurd that the two of them have been so oblivious to their feelings this whole time? It's not like they started out as friends, and the attraction snuck up on them. Apparently it was attraction FROM THE START, which they have spent the entire time repressing. Um, no. Remember how Angela had to actually EXPLAIN to Brennan that she has feelings for Booth? Because she apparently FORGOT that she'd been attracted to him when they first met? Uh-huh. Right.
And, okay, I am so FUCKING TIRED OF THE CHARACTERS SHIPPING BOOTH/BRENNAN. I love Sweets to death, but when he goes on and on about how Booth and Brennan love each other - god, he wrote a whole fucking book about it! Apparently, the writers think we need it explained to us, because someone does it in every. Single. Episode. Like I said, they are trying WAY too hard to convince us that these two belong together. Seriously, how many times do we need to be told that Booth and Brennan love each other and are meant to be together and blah blah FUCKING BLAH. You know what? If the audience needs this much convincing, maybe YOU SHOULD LEAVE IT THE FUCK ALONE.
And Caroline's another culprit. First there was the bullshit thing with the kiss under the mistletoe (which apparently Sweets totally forgot about, since he seems to think that a kiss will "break the dam" of their feelings), and then here she's calling Brennan "the beautiful scientist" and telling Booth to get her drunk? Gag me with a spoon. Seriously.
For a moment there, after they kissed, I was SO SURE they were going to make it all okay. When the two of them exchange looks and Brennan's all "Should we tell him?" I was like THANK GOD. They're just fucking with Sweets. None of this is true, they just made it up, which explains why NONE OF IT MAKES SENSE. But no. They couldn't even give me that.
AND THEN Sweets is like, "If you're not in love, how come you haven't been in any serious relationships since you first met?" Um, hello? CAM? What about Sully, whom Brennan was thinking of running off to the Caribbean with? Nah, let's just blissfully ignore canon as we explain again EXACTLY WHY THEY SHOULD BE TOGETHER. Give me a fucking break.
And then, because no rant would be complete without a nod to rampant sexism, Booth's line about "When you talk to older couples who've been together for 30 or 40 or 50 years, it's always the guy who says, 'I knew.'"
What. The. Fuck? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? So only MEN can recognize love? Only MEN are in touch with their feelings? I call bullshit on that one, so hard it'll make your head spin. But of course, Booth is "that guy." HE KNOWS. YES WE ALL KNOW BECAUSE YOU TOLD US ELEVENTY TIMES. *eyeroll*
*sigh* I didn't even talk about the sloppy writing, like how a JUDGE confesses to murder. He's a JUDGE. He should know his rights. And his lawyer doesn't even bother to stop him until AFTER he's incriminated himself, and then he's all, "That's enough." Way to shut the barn door after the horse is gone, buddy. Or Angela being a stereotypical artist who wants to move to Paris. Or Brennan blaming being a scientist for why she can't be in a relationship with Booth.
I give up.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So... remember how last week I complained about how Bones kind of sucks? Well, I posted it on my RL blog and one of my friends commented to say, "Just you wait until tonight's "Bones". This one'll throw you almost completely. I thought it was one of their best." Well, I just watched it, and all I can say is, "ORLY?"
Holy God, where to begin? First, let's just get this out of the way. Why does Booth have Don Draper hair? I realize it's a flashback episode, but it's not the 1960s, right?
So, we find out that Booth has a gambling problem. WHAT? Why has this never come up before, like, I don't know, in all the conversations he had with Jared about alcoholism and addiction?? Why have we never seen Booth seem to have an addictive personality - to gambling or anything else - during the entire course of the show? Maybe because they only made it up just now, so that Sweets could say, "You're the gambler," to get him to make a move with Brennan? *eyeroll* Have I mentioned how much I hate retcons that throw out important parts of canon solely for the sake of a joke or a clever reference?
And then we see how all the other characters met. Oh, how cleverly ironic, Hodgins and Zack hated each other before they started working together! *eyeroll* (However, I will take any excuse to have Zack back. I miss him so much!) I was also under the impression that Brennan and Angela had known each other a lot longer than just a year when the show started. But apparently they'd only met a month before this case? Because of course there has to be a "how the team got together" story that all happens during a single case.
And then there's a double error with Brennan and Cam. They quite obviously met for the first time in the first episode of season 2. I quote:
BOOTH: Don't call me Seeley. Dr. Brennan, Dr. Saroyan. You two know each other, huh?
BRENNAN: No.
CAM: No.
BOOTH: Uh-oh.
"Uh-oh" is right, buddy. Because somehow we have them meeting not once, but TWICE before that, because in this flashback, Cam says, "Didn't I meet you at some conference?"
And it doesn't end there! Caroline Julian ALSO apparently met Brennan for the first time twice. From season 1:
BOOTH: Hey, Temperance Brennan, Caroline Julian. She's your lawyer. (they shake hands) She's from the U.S. Attorney's Office. She's the best there is.
DETECTIVE HARDING: You found a prosecutor to defend her? Interesting tactic.
BRENNAN: I've told Detective Harding everything I know so far.
CAROLINE JULIAN: She's a fool. You didn't tell me she's a fool.
BOOTH: Look, she's a brilliant forensic anthropologist.
(Random sidebar of awesome: "Right now, it just looks like a sadistic children's book.")
And why doesn't Brennan know what the word "squint" means in the pilot if Booth called her that during this case? Also, in the pilot, Booth said that in their previous case, Brennan provided him with a description of the murder weapon and the murderer by just looking at autopsy x-rays. Which is... not this case. Oh, and remember how Brennan had to, like, beg Booth to let her go out in the field with him at first? And yet here he's all, "Let's go! Chop chop!"
And then the cherry on this sundae of suck: this is supposed to be a flashback to the first time Booth and Bones worked together. Except the two of them act the way they do NOW, not the way they did five years ago when the show started. It's the most bizarre mix of nostalgia and trying too hard to push the Booth/Brennan relationship. Do they not realize that all the flirting and the KISSING and the ALMOST HAVING SEX makes it absolutely absurd that the two of them have been so oblivious to their feelings this whole time? It's not like they started out as friends, and the attraction snuck up on them. Apparently it was attraction FROM THE START, which they have spent the entire time repressing. Um, no. Remember how Angela had to actually EXPLAIN to Brennan that she has feelings for Booth? Because she apparently FORGOT that she'd been attracted to him when they first met? Uh-huh. Right.
And, okay, I am so FUCKING TIRED OF THE CHARACTERS SHIPPING BOOTH/BRENNAN. I love Sweets to death, but when he goes on and on about how Booth and Brennan love each other - god, he wrote a whole fucking book about it! Apparently, the writers think we need it explained to us, because someone does it in every. Single. Episode. Like I said, they are trying WAY too hard to convince us that these two belong together. Seriously, how many times do we need to be told that Booth and Brennan love each other and are meant to be together and blah blah FUCKING BLAH. You know what? If the audience needs this much convincing, maybe YOU SHOULD LEAVE IT THE FUCK ALONE.
And Caroline's another culprit. First there was the bullshit thing with the kiss under the mistletoe (which apparently Sweets totally forgot about, since he seems to think that a kiss will "break the dam" of their feelings), and then here she's calling Brennan "the beautiful scientist" and telling Booth to get her drunk? Gag me with a spoon. Seriously.
For a moment there, after they kissed, I was SO SURE they were going to make it all okay. When the two of them exchange looks and Brennan's all "Should we tell him?" I was like THANK GOD. They're just fucking with Sweets. None of this is true, they just made it up, which explains why NONE OF IT MAKES SENSE. But no. They couldn't even give me that.
AND THEN Sweets is like, "If you're not in love, how come you haven't been in any serious relationships since you first met?" Um, hello? CAM? What about Sully, whom Brennan was thinking of running off to the Caribbean with? Nah, let's just blissfully ignore canon as we explain again EXACTLY WHY THEY SHOULD BE TOGETHER. Give me a fucking break.
And then, because no rant would be complete without a nod to rampant sexism, Booth's line about "When you talk to older couples who've been together for 30 or 40 or 50 years, it's always the guy who says, 'I knew.'"
What. The. Fuck? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? So only MEN can recognize love? Only MEN are in touch with their feelings? I call bullshit on that one, so hard it'll make your head spin. But of course, Booth is "that guy." HE KNOWS. YES WE ALL KNOW BECAUSE YOU TOLD US ELEVENTY TIMES. *eyeroll*
*sigh* I didn't even talk about the sloppy writing, like how a JUDGE confesses to murder. He's a JUDGE. He should know his rights. And his lawyer doesn't even bother to stop him until AFTER he's incriminated himself, and then he's all, "That's enough." Way to shut the barn door after the horse is gone, buddy. Or Angela being a stereotypical artist who wants to move to Paris. Or Brennan blaming being a scientist for why she can't be in a relationship with Booth.
I give up.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 03:26 am (UTC)Good god, this episode sucked like a show's never sucked before! UGH.
I approve of this post. TRUTH.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 03:40 am (UTC)Didn't DB direct this episode? The Whedonesque feed has been making a big deal about it of late. Maybe he's just gotten so used to being the male part of the PTB's OTP that it's gone to his head? Because that episode made about as much sense as #34.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 04:26 am (UTC)I do recall reading something about DB directing, but most of this stuff wouldn't be his fault - that's all on the writers. I doubt he's going to do that much editing to the script.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 03:41 am (UTC)(This is why I love shows so much when they have good Show Bibles for the writers to reference. Frasier and Farscape being the two that spring to mind...)
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 04:32 am (UTC)I just watched it...
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 06:12 am (UTC)Re: I just watched it...
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 07:16 am (UTC)That said, I don't hold Bones to the highest standards, because it's sort of consistently had some believability problems (at least post-S2, but always with the question of how an ultra-rational ultra-literal person like Brennan, with zero imagination and understanding of human nature, could be a fiction writer at all -- the previous episode tried to explain some of that, I think, but not all that well). I'm mostly here for the fun characters and their zippy chemistry and -- overall -- the smart writing. BUT. This episode screwed with all of that, and left me wondering what the point was, except to make them both (and Sweets -- yes, we get it, Sweets is the audience, but even WE are not that preoccupied with what happens to them, fyi) seem like idiots. At the very least, introduce some conflict by having Booth walk the fuck away in a huff at the end there! Instead, he's like, "Okay, that's fine. Let's bump our hips together and be goofy now!" LAME.
It's pretty obvious that the producers are trying to give us what we want without actually *giving* it to us, because they're terrified of ye olde Moonlighting curse. What they don't realize is that there is no reason NOT go for it at this point, because Brennan/Booth could be fascinating as a couple. They don't have to lose their spark. Besides, we're in the 5th season now. Two more years and it's over -- just take the freaking leap already!
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 08:56 am (UTC)That bugged me too. Brennan just shot down Booth, but she still lays her head on his shoulder as they walk away. I mean, really?
What they don't realize is that there is no reason NOT go for it at this point, because Brennan/Booth could be fascinating as a couple.
At this point, I'm betting that they're much more fascinating as a couple than as the will-they-won't-they thing they have going on right now, which they have played with more than enough already.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:47 pm (UTC)It's pretty obvious that the producers are trying to give us what we want without actually *giving* it to us, because they're terrified of ye olde Moonlighting curse
Heh, I saw someone describe it as, "You know how you can take a flashlight and shine it on the floor, and a cat will ignorantly chase that small circle of light all over the place in a futile effort to catch the light? Just flick your wrist in one direction, then the next, making the light dart this way and that? HH holds the flashlight, and we, the fans, are the stupid cat." *snicker*
The thing that makes me roll my eyes is that everyone cites Moonlighting as the reason you should never get a will-they-won't-they couple together because it'll ruin the show. Except Moonlighting didn't suddenly get terrible because they got together. It was already terrible because they'd done so much stupid shit to keep them apart, so by the time they actually did get together, hardly anyone was left to see it. (Sound familiar?)
I'm undoubtedly in the minority, in that I don't want Booth and Brennan together, and I've NEVER wanted them together. I like them much, much better as close friends with a brother/sister love for each other, and I've felt like all the supposed sexual tension between them seemed so forced - if you have to have a character tell the audience every episode how much they're meant to be together, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG. So the will-they-won't-they crap drives me up the wall not because they keep teasing us with the idea of a relationship, but because they keep HARPING on it when I just want them to get the hell over it and move on.
I would LOVE it if this episode did that, but I am absolutely certain that Booth's "I need to move on" is not the last we've heard on the subject. At this point, I just want them to sleep together, decide it was a terrible idea, and go back to being friends, but I'm sure I won't get that.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 07:19 am (UTC)I was thinking of doing a post about this asinine episode! But you said EVERYTHING I was thinking. I stopped caring about/shipping Brennan/Booth a long time ago, but I wanted to throw something at my screen when she used being a scientist as an excuse for why she couldn't be with him. What the hell? Are all the female scientist/geniuses of the world living alone? What a load of crap!
That put the nail in the coffin for me. Zach could come back permanently, Hodgins and Angela could get back together, and James Marsters could guest star and I wouldn't watch it!
Forget two thumbs down, I give it two middle fingers up.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 07:43 am (UTC)So yeah, thanks for watching this episode so I don't have to. Goodbye Bones. :(
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 08:55 am (UTC)I'm so pissed off that I got so excited for this 100th episode and this is what I get. ARGH!
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 10:42 am (UTC)...But it's great to see someone ranting about a work of entertainment that isn't Season 8 for once. ;-)
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 01:56 pm (UTC)1. I can honesly say I enjoyed this episode...AFTER I watched it a second time onlline whilst pretending I had NEVER SEEN AN EPISODE BEFORE THIS ONE. Yeah. If episode 100 was a persons very first experience with the show, totally enjoyable.
2. Again, after the second viewing, I could kinda logic my way through so many of the OMGWTF plot devices (but if it's truly good writing, I shouldn't have to DO that grr argh), like saying the reason Booth and Brennan had to start over from friendship scratch was because of how badly their first meeting ended and then a year of not seeing each other, and the initial attraction has just slowly crept back into their interactions. Meh. I'm doing the writers' jobs for them, I know.
3. I did appreciate their attempts to bring up little things in this "first" case that have been mentioned throughout the show like we should have known about them, like Booth's gambling (apparently a year is all it takes to kick a destructive habit and behave as though you were never addicted in the first place. Whatev.), Booth's descendency (hm, real/fake word?) from John Wilkes Booth, why Booth never really liked Zack cuz he called him stupid (even though Brennan also called him stupid. Whatev.), how Brennan gave Booth the idea of his little rebellions against FBI dress code (even though when Dr. Gordon Gordon Wyatt pointed the same thing out he acted like he didn't realize he did it. Whatev.), and...yeah, so what if I'd had to qualify everything on this list. Hrmph.
4. BOOTH'S HAIR-PART WAS LIKE 17 FEET LONG OMG. So distracting.
5. I thought maybe when they gave each other that look after Sweets asked how long their affair lasted they would throw him for a loop and say that it was STILL lasting, heh, and they'd just been bullshitting everyone else all this time, though that's hardly original. It's called 'Sculdering' for a reason. Who knows, they still might go there.
6. I had to ignore the Cam and Caroline plot holes entirely, else my brain would have imploded.
7. While I gave them props for having Booth actually SAY something at the end of the episode, as opposed to the let's-just-let-all-this-unspoken-stuff-sit-there-untalked-about thing they've been doing thus far, given how they chose to end the episode, I can now write the rest of this season: Booth tries to "move on," probably dates a throwaway character, while Brennan watches from the sidelines in cold, scientific jealousy but knowing logically that she already turned him down and now she must accept their tragic fate, Booth senses her cold, scientific jealousy and tries ONE LAST TIME to see if they can make it work together and OMG Brennan throws cold, scientific caution to the wind and they engage in passionate, tearful coitus in the season finale, leaving the audience to wonder if they will actually be in a relationship next season or will something go wrong again??? *GASP*
8. All that being said, I'm sadly invested in these characters, and could no sooner abandon this show than I could BtVS after Season 6 started going horribly wrong. Le sigh.
Thanks for letting me participate in Bones-y rantiness. :-d
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 03:06 pm (UTC)I did appreciate their attempts to bring up little things in this "first" case that have been mentioned throughout the show
I thought a lot of that seemed really forced. Like Brennan being the cause of Booth's rebellion - why can't he just be an individual on his own? Why does Brennan have to be the one to tell him? (Other than, of course, it's another clue they're Made For Each Other because she helps him to be himself or some bullshit.) And all the stuff with the squints, like the Very First Experiment coinciding with the first time the whole team has worked together - why does everything have to have happened for the first time on the same case?? And Hodgins line about "Do you get the feeling something great almost happened?" or whatever? *eyeroll* WE GET IT.
I thought maybe when they gave each other that look after Sweets asked how long their affair lasted they would throw him for a loop and say that it was STILL lasting
Heh, I thought that, too, for a second, but that would've been an ENORMOUS retcon that I don't think ANYONE would've accepted gracefully, so I figured them lying to Sweets was the more likely option.
And yeah, I'm pretty sure your scenario is exactly how the rest of the season will play out. So... awesome, now I don't have to watch it.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 05:27 pm (UTC)All that being said, this particular ep was esp barfworthy on so many levels...
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 06:55 pm (UTC)Totally with you on the gross factor, though. I've learned not to watch this show while eating dinner. Ever.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 10:06 pm (UTC)Not that it made this episode any easier to swallow. Ugh.
no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 11th, 2010 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 12th, 2010 01:31 am (UTC)Another nit-picky thing: Angela started off on the show as having computer skills. Like didn't she design that program that showed people being hit by things with certain amounts of force or whatever? And she's also done a lot of touching up photos and videos using more obscure computer programs, even touching up sound recordings (during which I'm pretty sure she talked about Fourier components). Then the show made her "just an artist" and now the show is making her have NO training at all in anything relating to forensics. Just so that they can contrast her more strongly with Brenon? Stupid.
Also, Booth's gambling problem did come up before. They did an episode in Las Vegas or something? That still doesn't make it very believable. I didn't believe it the first time. But at least the writer's remember some things they have written in the past.
no subject
Date: Apr. 12th, 2010 01:48 am (UTC)And yeah, it seemed like they were trying to clumsily set up Angela's future with computer programs with Caroline saying, "Maybe if it were on a computer with bells and whistles," about her flipbook thing, but I didn't think it worked very well. Newsflash, Bones writers: Graphic design IS ART. Being "just an artist" does not mean you don't know how to use a computer.
Other people have pointed out the Vegas episode. I don't remember it well, but I'm guessing that the gambling problem felt like a random, previously unestablished character trait thrown in just for the sake of conflict in that episode, which is why I didn't remember it...
Also linked!
Date: Apr. 12th, 2010 10:37 am (UTC)Stupid stupid episode.
Re: Also linked!
Date: Apr. 12th, 2010 01:08 pm (UTC)I want the old Bones back!
Date: Apr. 13th, 2010 03:43 am (UTC)At this point all they are doing is trying to string us along. Like you said, "will-they-won't-they." I think the worry is loss of interest or some BS. But I am sick of sitting around waiting for something to happen. I am tired of shipping them and at this point I could care less. I want my old Bones back. Circa seasons 1 and 2.
You said one of the things about Bones for you was Aliens in a Spaceship. Which is one of my favorite episodes. No doubt. I want that back.
Re: I want the old Bones back!
Date: Apr. 13th, 2010 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 15th, 2010 07:09 am (UTC)One thing I do have to point out though, they actually have mentioned Booth's gambling problem before. In the episode they went to Vegas, he was acting all weird there and Brennan brought up the fact he shouldn't be there.
no subject
Date: Apr. 15th, 2010 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Apr. 15th, 2010 02:09 pm (UTC)It was a lambast from start to finish. Makes me real, real sad when a show I've come to love runs off the rails in such a jarring way. Hate that these characters were fucked about with like this. Ack.
I'm with ya, sister. No more new Bones. I'll keep re-watching older eps on cable but that's all, folks.
no subject
Date: Apr. 15th, 2010 02:40 pm (UTC)Word. It's been a long time coming, I think. I've been consistently disappointed with Bones for a while now, and the end of last season was HORRIBLE. But it seemed like it was getting a little better again, and then - wham! Suckfest.