Linkspam

[next_to_normal]

* Robert Redford is confirmed as playing "the head of S.H.I.E.L.D." in Captain America: Winter Soldier.

* Iron Man 3 trailer #9,202, plus a clip of Tony talking to a gaggle of reporters. At some point, I won't even need to see the movie.

* The J. August Richards S.H.I.E.L.D. role I linked to the other day has been confirmed.

* Aaron Tveit's new USA drama, Graceland, has a series premiere date.

* Is Matt Weiner's Mad Men spoiler phobia making unreasonable demands of TV critics? I mostly think he's being silly, since NO ONE watches Mad Men for the ~shocking twists.

* Apply for a job at Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce! I apparently would make a good copy writer.

* If you missed the last five minutes of this week's episode of The Americans, FX has apologized for the DVR snafu and made the episode available online. Good thing, because those were a killer five minutes!

* I love oral histories. This one's for Jurassic Park. Also. the scene from the movie that real paleontologists say is unrealistic. It's... not ANY of the ones you'd expect.

* Jason Segel has written a series of YA books. I'm actually kind of curious to read them...

Comments

[pocochina]

Eh, I don't know if Weiner's issue about spoilers is about the *shocking twists* so much as avoiding fan expectations spinning out of control? One could perhaps from the outside construe fandom as having a tendency to seize on spoilers and make rigid normative and aesthetic judgments months before the plot point airs in the proper context.

[next_to_normal]

No, I don't think it's about shocking twists - since there really aren't any - I think it's, as Mo Ryan says in the article I linked, that Weiner's a control freak who wants to micromanage what people say about the show.

Fan expectations are certainly something to consider, but I'm not talking about spoiling plot points months in advance. I'm talking about the usual hints that you see in official pre-season reviews. There's plenty that could be discussed in vague terms (like WHAT YEAR IT IS or WHO'S IN THE SHOW) that wouldn't cement expectations prior to airing. TV critics do it all the time with every other show out there. Why should Matt Weiner get special snowflake treatment?

Weiner is restricting what TV critics can talk about to the point that it's impossible to write a useful review. When they're expected to write about a television show without talking about the characters or their relationships, I think we've reached the point of absurdity, lol.