I was talking to
slaymesoftly last night about how I'm finding myself disappointed with Spuffy fic more often, and I said something like, "Even though I'm a Spuffy fan, I get tired of reading fic after fic about them getting together. At some point, it just gets repetitive, and I feel like I'm reading the same fic over and over." There are, after all, only so many ways to "fix" Spuffy. And (as usual) I kind of got the feeling that I'm a little weird, because I don't really care if my OTP ends up happy, miserable, or dead, as long as it's a good story.
Then, today,
angearia asked for recs for writing tips/websites/etc. and I followed a trail of recs from her post to this one on tension, and I had a lightbulb moment. Here's what the poster had to say:
"In the early stages, I am so in love with the characters that I always care about what happens to them, so absent the "killer factors" I am likely to read and enjoy a wide variety of stories. But at some point I am not automatically invested in, say, John and Rodney getting together. When that happens, I need more than just that. That is, it can certainly be a romance in which the plot is entirely about John and Rodney getting together. But the story needs to dangle compelling questions in front of my nose, to make me feel that it is important for them to get together, to show me the obstacles to them getting together - which will make me want to read more and find out how it happens."
That's exactly it. It's not enough for me that a fic has Spike and Buffy in it. It's not enough that they get together. (In fact, sometimes I'd rather they didn't get together.) I'm not automatically sold on a story just because it's about my OTP. Maybe I'm picky, but I want it to be compelling, too.
The thing is, I'm not tired of Spuffy. It's not that I find their relationship any less compelling than I used to. What I think I am tired of is reading the same old recycled plots and premises, because I already know how it's going to go, and that's not compelling.
I feel like this dovetails with a lot of different things - the "what if" approach to fic vs. the "fix it" approach, real conflict vs. false/manufactured conflict, predictable endings, gen fic vs. shippy fic, tension in sex scenes - but I don't have the energy right now to do a long meta, so I'm kind of just throwing it out there.
Then, today,
"In the early stages, I am so in love with the characters that I always care about what happens to them, so absent the "killer factors" I am likely to read and enjoy a wide variety of stories. But at some point I am not automatically invested in, say, John and Rodney getting together. When that happens, I need more than just that. That is, it can certainly be a romance in which the plot is entirely about John and Rodney getting together. But the story needs to dangle compelling questions in front of my nose, to make me feel that it is important for them to get together, to show me the obstacles to them getting together - which will make me want to read more and find out how it happens."
That's exactly it. It's not enough for me that a fic has Spike and Buffy in it. It's not enough that they get together. (In fact, sometimes I'd rather they didn't get together.) I'm not automatically sold on a story just because it's about my OTP. Maybe I'm picky, but I want it to be compelling, too.
The thing is, I'm not tired of Spuffy. It's not that I find their relationship any less compelling than I used to. What I think I am tired of is reading the same old recycled plots and premises, because I already know how it's going to go, and that's not compelling.
I feel like this dovetails with a lot of different things - the "what if" approach to fic vs. the "fix it" approach, real conflict vs. false/manufactured conflict, predictable endings, gen fic vs. shippy fic, tension in sex scenes - but I don't have the energy right now to do a long meta, so I'm kind of just throwing it out there.
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 08:25 pm (UTC)I think the fact that BtVS is an older fandom means that, yeah, a lot of the obvious ideas have been done. A lot. Over and over. And, like you, I do get kinda tired of the same old same old. It means that writers have to work harder to come up with something different and exciting.
Yeah, I'm not really going anywhere with those thoughts. But it is something I've been thinking about lately. :)
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 08:43 pm (UTC)I guess the other part of it is that I usually do work harder to come up with something different and exciting. I've scrapped plenty of fic ideas because I couldn't come up with anything to differentiate them from the 1,000 fics already out there with the same idea. And, naturally, everyone else should think like me *g* so it kind of surprises me that other people are happy to read and write the same stories over and over.
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 08:32 pm (UTC)OTOH, a lot of people are limerance junkies: they want that swooning will-they-won't-they first love moment over and over. And over and over and over and over. Witness the popularity of romance novels in general.
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 08:51 pm (UTC)If only that weren't exactly the opposite of what I'm looking for, I'd be all set, lol.
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 09:43 pm (UTC)Yep. I'm right with you. It's one of the huge reasons I have a thing for S4 and early-S5 Spuffy: the author can't just work through Spike and Buffy's issues, because they don't really have any together yet, so the plots tend to be more original. But I'm up for Spuffy set just about anytime if the author has an interesting premise and does more than just rehashing old issues (and, you know, has all that other good stuff like recognizable characterization, decent prose, etc).
I'm beginning to think that the evolution of a fandom - or maybe even a pairing in fandom - is a lot like the evolution of a genre, say science fiction. A lot of pulp SF in the 30's and 40's featured labcoated scientists making Discoveries. And... that was pretty much it. They discovered something, they talked about it a bit, occasionally the something tried to kill them. But eventually readers and writers started pushing for more plot, greater character complexity, etc. And yet, to some extent, SF as a genre is still building on Clarke and Asimov. And I wonder if a long-lasting fandom or pairing doesn't work like that, too - once you've worked out all the obvious permutations of Spuffy, people start writing the less obvious ones. (Of course, then you've got people like Yahtzee who were doing totally unique stuff right of the box...)
Hmm, not sure how coherent that was. Short version: I agree with you. *g*
no subject
Date: May. 12th, 2009 10:15 pm (UTC)Hmmm, I don't know about that. Every season has its standard Spuffy tropes. In s2 it's "Spike has his way with 17th century Buffy on Halloween" or "Buffy feels bad for wheelchair-bound Spike." In s4 it's all about the "Something Blue" spell, or "Buffy realizes Riley's an ass and Spike is the perfect man for her." (That one shows up a lot in s5, too.) And then in all seasons you've got "a spell made us do it," mystical-pregnancy babyfics, claims, etc.
I don't think it's season so much that determines the originality of the fic. I think a lot of it has to do with the author. In the hands of a good author, even those tropes can be made original (sometimes in a deliberate "Ha! I'll show them it can be done!" effort).
I'm up for Spuffy set just about anytime if the author has an interesting premise and does more than just rehashing old issues (and, you know, has all that other good stuff like recognizable characterization, decent prose, etc).
Word. :)
The analogy to sci-fi is an interesting one, although I think maybe it works more on an individual scale than a fandom level. There are definitely readers and writers like us who get bored with the obvious and start looking for the less obvious. But there's always the churn of fans who leave altogether when they get bored, and new fans entering the fandom who lap up the obvious stuff, because they haven't read it twenty times yet. So the obvious stuff keeps being popular, even when the old guard is tired of it.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 12:39 am (UTC)Very true. I dunno; in my experience, the mediocre fic for, say, S4 tends to be doing a wider variety of things than the mediocre S6 fic. But I definitely sympathize with the "anything can good if it's written well enough" school.
The analogy to sci-fi is an interesting one, although I think maybe it works more on an individual scale than a fandom level.
Possibly true. I guess I was thinking more that once you have the obvious stuff, you're more likely to start getting the less obvious stuff. Like, I think some of that groundwork needs to get laid in the fandom consciousness before you're likely to get anything radical. Faith/Giles is my brand new ship (thanks to the comics), and at this point most of the fic I'm seeing is of the plotless, conversation- and sex-based variety. And I think you almost have to have that before writers start branching out into plottier, more complex stories.
Actually, it occurs to me that a ship like Spander would be a great way to test this, one way or another - since it's never been canon and yet is wildly popular, in theory you ought to be able to trace the evolution of the ship, to some extent. Except that would involve actually reading the fics, which I have no desire to do. *g*
Or maybe I'm just talking out of my hat. Always a possibility. :)
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 01:52 pm (UTC)Yeah, that's probably true. But I'm not sure it's such a good thing that there are more ways to be mediocre. :)
I guess I was thinking more that once you have the obvious stuff, you're more likely to start getting the less obvious stuff.
Hmmmm. I've never really come into a fandom at the beginning, so there's always been a good selection of fics by the time I got there. It does seem like a logical pattern for ships to follow.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 07:38 am (UTC)I think s4 has so many opportunities for an original plotting. There are traditional spells. There is The Initiative - so a writer can use sci-fi technologies to develop an original situation. There is Mayor's body-switching mojo. There already is a LA support team - Doyle with his visions; Kate, if you need a police factor; and Angel, who is always there when you need him to provide a bit of jealosy.
The only problem with season 4 is the absence of the place where you can gather all the characters. In season 1-3 it's the school library. In s5-6 - The Magic Box. In s7 - Casa Summers. But season 4 has only Giles' apartment. Send Giles away for a while and the plotting becomes much harder... :)
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 08:23 pm (UTC)(Dammit, moscow, stop giving me plotbunnies!)
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 08:37 pm (UTC)Believe me, they can't find a place to meet. Buffy and Willow live in the campus room, Xander lives in a basement, Spike lives in a crypt. Once I wrote a s4 fic in Russian: Faith ends up in Buffy's body and escapes to LA, Buffy ends up in Spike's body and learns a lot of unexpected things about vampires and Spike ends up in Faith's body and sucessfully turns Buffy's life in a nightmare. I immediately realized that Giles would have figured out who is who in a heartbeat, so I sent him away... and found out I don't have a place where I could gather Scoobies for discussions, research etc.
(Dammit, moscow, stop giving me plotbunnies!)
Heeee! This is my evil plan - to seduce you with an idea of a long plotty story...
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 12:32 am (UTC)LOL, I never really thought about that, but yeah. Giles really doesn't appear much in "Closure" - there's one group research scene at his apartment, but other than that, it's all scenes of twos and threes at the dorm or Xander's house.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 12:01 am (UTC)I do find myself getting bored with some of the popular Spuffy fanfic tropes. It's partially why I love time travel fics because it jumbles up the whole predictable equation. And I guess it's why I'm writing Season 8 fic which one reader said something like 'takes the interesting premises of Season 8, ignores the rest and makes it Spuffy'. As a reader though, it's rare for me to find new Spuffy fic that hits that right note and feels like an instant classic. I've seen and read too much. Gah, I've been reading Spuffy fanfic since 2003.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:03 pm (UTC)It's partially why I love time travel fics because it jumbles up the whole predictable equation.
Huh. I would say that time travel is just as much of a trope as anything else - there's so many "Buffy goes back to 1880 and meets human William" fics, and they all basically end with Buffy getting back to the present and developing feelings for Spike after knowing him as a human. And the number of "Buffy and/or Spike go back in time to fix something which results in their relationship turning out better in the future" fics is probably even higher - especially the "Buffy realizes she screwed up after Spike is dead, and goes back in time to fix it." There's certainly potential for originality, but most authors don't seem to go for it.
I was really hoping that Season 8 would bring lots of original fic ideas, since it's the first fresh material we've had to work with in years. But overall, there really hasn't been much fic coming out of it. Of course, I don't like how S8 has turned out (which was a disappointment in itself), so I'm not too interested in the fic anyway.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 12:07 am (UTC)I agree with
I find myself more interested in future fics now, though. There's more room for imagination,and not so many ideas have occurred to other writers yet. Although, I could really do without Buffy punching Spike in the nose the first time she sees him...that one's already way past old.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:27 pm (UTC)True. But even then, there's only so many ways it can go. No matter how many little things you change about "Something Blue," you're almost always going to end up with a fic where the spell gets them together sooner than they would have in canon. Maybe a good author can come up with an original twist (I like to think I did, by using "Hush"), but even then, it's still a fairly predictable result.
Although, I could really do without Buffy punching Spike in the nose the first time she sees him...that one's already way past old.
LOL, I've used that one, too. Although I wrote it two and a half years ago, so it was probably more original then. :)
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 09:05 pm (UTC)And, yeah, same for a lot of my season IV/V fics. The ideas seemed new at the time, but with great minds thinking alike and all that, they now are just one more version of same-old, same-old. Since the point of most Spuffy fic (barring those stories that are more gen and just have the two in the story - pre or post spuffy maybe) is to get them together, it seems logical to me to use the obvious point where canon has provided an excuse. The only original way to twist that episode, is to have her stake him in a fit of embarrassment. But then, there goes the rest of the show....
I guess, there just are certain places/events that lend themselves to earlier than canon togetherness, and I don't really have a big problem with an author using them as taking off points as long as the story itself is fairly original and interesting. If someone comes up with a point in canon that is unique from anything anyone else has used, more power to them. Certainly a story that went off from someplace like that would be unlikely to be boring. But I don't think it means that those who've used the more obvious events haven't written entertaining stories.
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 12:45 am (UTC)Heh, well, there's the problem right there. Like I said in the original post, I'm not looking for Spuffy fic that's just about them getting together, so picking an obvious point to make it easy to get them together is usually exactly the opposite of what I want to read.
But I don't think it means that those who've used the more obvious events haven't written entertaining stories.
Well, of course. No statement about fanfiction is an absolute. I feel like people assume that a lot. I'll say I don't like something in a post and there's always a response like, "So you're saying all (fill in the blank) fics suck?" No, they don't. There's always an exception. But the more fics you read with the same premise, the less entertaining they're going to be - which was what prompted this post, when I read the #458th fic with that particular premise and rolled my eyes.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:32 pm (UTC)But I love the epics, where there is slowly built up Spuffy to go along with a great adventure involving the whole gang.
Word. I think I prefer fics that incorporate the whole gang, because it feels more like the balance of the show. Plus, as much as I love Spike and Buffy, I love all the other characters, too.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 01:50 pm (UTC)I'd gladly read it!
I love stories that end on a holeful note: maybe, someday... Or stories where they part but learn a lesson from their experience. Or Spuffy what-ifs, that deviate from the canon but, eventually, steer back to the story we saw onscreen.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:47 pm (UTC)Oh man. Unrelated to this post, but you totally hit on a nerve with that one. It drives me crazy when I see people who insist that Buffy ought to be with Spike just because he loves her, as though she's somehow obligated to indulge anyone who has feelings for her, regardless of how she may feel about him. (I don't recall anyone saying that on Xander's behalf in s1/s2...)
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 06:17 pm (UTC)Many of us did have a skewed perspective about some things back in the day, which is hard to explain to those who weren't around at the times. The Spike/Spuffy fans got so much stick in the wider fandom that they had a tendency to circle the wagons and defend Spike, no matter what. I really did think most people had got over that, though.
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 15th, 2009 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 01:57 pm (UTC)When I do take the time to read (or rec) a Spuffy fic now, it's because I think there's something deeply compelling or extraordinary about it.
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 02:42 pm (UTC)Yeah, as much as I love epic fics, there are many out there that could benefit from a good editor. Even though they want them together, people like to draaaaag out the actual Spuffy.
When I do take the time to read (or rec) a Spuffy fic now, it's because I think there's something deeply compelling or extraordinary about it.
LOL, I'm probably super-picky, because that's what I want for EVERY fic (both the ones I read and the ones I write).
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 04:17 pm (UTC)Hee!
no subject
Date: May. 13th, 2009 08:04 pm (UTC)Was going to say something along the lines of, when you've been reading fanfic for a while, it becomes increasingly difficult to find something to read that doesn't feel like something you've seen many times before. Perhaps there are only so many themes and it becomes harder and harder to find a new variation on it?
For myself, though I read a lot of Spuffy in the past, I barely read it now, so when I write it, I'm very conscious that I could well be repeating something others have already done many times with the couple without even realising it.
Am not much interested in Spuffy stories the whole point of which is getting them together, though. I tend to want to focus on what came after that.
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 12:49 am (UTC)True, although I still kind of think of myself as a newbie. I'm not really - I've been reading and writing for almost three years - but compared to people who've been here a decade and haven't gotten bored yet, I feel like I've barely cut my teeth.
Perhaps there are only so many themes and it becomes harder and harder to find a new variation on it?
Probably true. Part of me wants to say that there are infinite possibilities, but when you boil it down, there's probably only so many stories to tell.
no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 08:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: May. 14th, 2009 01:26 pm (UTC)