Cordy/Angel meta
Aug. 15th, 2008 10:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There's a thread on the BSV forum on the Cordy/Angel relationship, and I'll probably get around to posting this there when I get a chance, but I figured I might as well jot down my thoughts while I was thinking them. Also, I've been trying to post more stuff here besides fic and memes, and for the most part, people seem to like the meta, so here goes.
I was never really into Cordy/Angel. I mean, I get objectively why they'd make a good pairing, but I just wasn't invested in them. (Also, I think the things that would make them a good pairing are the same things that made them a fantastic friendship, so why mess with a good thing?) So, last night, I was watching "Spin the Bottle" (thank you, Scarlet), and I finally figured out what about the ship turns me off.
It's trying to be Bangel.
Or maybe I'm just completely anti-pairing on Angel, since this episode also reminded me how annoying the Wes/Fred/Gunn triangle was. I didn't mind Fred and Gunn together, but with Wes pining away... I mean, holy crap, boys, stop fighting over her! She's not worth it!
I can't actually think of any ship I liked on that show (except for the implied Spangel). Cordy/Doyle? Mostly one-sided and he was gone too fast for me to get invested. Angel/Fred? Totally hero worship and icky. Wes/Lilah? I... kinda block that out since it was during the parts of season 4 I dislike. Cordy/Connor? No explanation needed. Lindsey/Eve? I just hate Eve, so anything that gives her more screen time is bad. Wes/Fred? Weirdly obsessive and by the time they got together, I think Wes was more in love with the idealized version of Fred he'd pined for than the actual girl. Angel/Nina? Blah. Nina was practically a non-entity.
It's funny, because although I clearly have my preferences (*cough* Spuffy), I don't have any problem with the other canon pairings on Buffy (except Willow/Kennedy), and I regularly incorporate them into my fics. But Angel, for some reason, is like pairing kryptonite to me.
I was never really into Cordy/Angel. I mean, I get objectively why they'd make a good pairing, but I just wasn't invested in them. (Also, I think the things that would make them a good pairing are the same things that made them a fantastic friendship, so why mess with a good thing?) So, last night, I was watching "Spin the Bottle" (thank you, Scarlet), and I finally figured out what about the ship turns me off.
It's trying to be Bangel.
It's as though the writers felt like the best way to compete with the Buffy/Angel relationship was to make Cordy/Angel just as star-crossed - even though the relationship was completely different. The thing is, Cordy and Angel had this deep friendship Buffy and Angel never had. And it didn't have to be romantic - their chemistry reminds me a lot of early Buffy/Willow, or season 5 Angel/Spike. (In fact, Cordy's relationship with Angel is exactly like Spike's. They both know him better than anyone, they're the ones to always call him on his shit, and they're the best at bringing out both petty!Angel and hero!Angel... and omg, I just realized that Spike was totally brought in to replace Cordy twice.)
Er, yeah. Where was I? Right. Angel and Cordy, totally different foundation from Angel and Buffy. But as soon as Angel recognizes his feelings for Cordy, the writers start throwing up one artificial roadblock after another, trying to come up with ways to keep them apart, when there's really no good reason to. First it's Groo, then Cordy disappears, then she's back but she's lost her memory, then she remembers everything, but she knows too much, then the Connor thing, and then he's evil, and then she's evil, and by the time we get to the coma, instead of thinking how sad it is that they missed their chance and they'll never be together, I'm going ZOMG, thank goodness it's finally OVER! Which I don't think was the intention...
The thing is, Bangel was star-crossed because they really could never be together. Even without the vampire/Slayer obstacle, or Angel's slippery soul, their relationship was teenage and idealistic, and that never, ever works out in real life. But Cordy and Angel were different. They had a solid friendship, and there was no good reason they couldn't turn it into a relationship, if they'd just, y'know, put a little effort into it. But instead we get two years of UST and pining away, and the whole time I'm thinking, "Be together. Don't be together. It doesn't matter. Just stop angsting about it." (Which, incidentally, is what I spent much of the early seasons saying to Buffy and Angel.)
If they wanted to go the relationship route with Cordy and Angel, the model shouldn't have been Bangel, it should have been Spuffy. Sure, Buffy and Spike were messy, and complicated, and occasionally just plain awful, but they were real. The conflict between them was internal, not some external roadblock that keeps them apart (and, IMO, internal conflict is always a better story than external conflict). And that's what I wanted to see from Cordy/Angel (or would have wanted to see, if I'd actually cared about them getting together).
Er, yeah. Where was I? Right. Angel and Cordy, totally different foundation from Angel and Buffy. But as soon as Angel recognizes his feelings for Cordy, the writers start throwing up one artificial roadblock after another, trying to come up with ways to keep them apart, when there's really no good reason to. First it's Groo, then Cordy disappears, then she's back but she's lost her memory, then she remembers everything, but she knows too much, then the Connor thing, and then he's evil, and then she's evil, and by the time we get to the coma, instead of thinking how sad it is that they missed their chance and they'll never be together, I'm going ZOMG, thank goodness it's finally OVER! Which I don't think was the intention...
The thing is, Bangel was star-crossed because they really could never be together. Even without the vampire/Slayer obstacle, or Angel's slippery soul, their relationship was teenage and idealistic, and that never, ever works out in real life. But Cordy and Angel were different. They had a solid friendship, and there was no good reason they couldn't turn it into a relationship, if they'd just, y'know, put a little effort into it. But instead we get two years of UST and pining away, and the whole time I'm thinking, "Be together. Don't be together. It doesn't matter. Just stop angsting about it." (Which, incidentally, is what I spent much of the early seasons saying to Buffy and Angel.)
If they wanted to go the relationship route with Cordy and Angel, the model shouldn't have been Bangel, it should have been Spuffy. Sure, Buffy and Spike were messy, and complicated, and occasionally just plain awful, but they were real. The conflict between them was internal, not some external roadblock that keeps them apart (and, IMO, internal conflict is always a better story than external conflict). And that's what I wanted to see from Cordy/Angel (or would have wanted to see, if I'd actually cared about them getting together).
Or maybe I'm just completely anti-pairing on Angel, since this episode also reminded me how annoying the Wes/Fred/Gunn triangle was. I didn't mind Fred and Gunn together, but with Wes pining away... I mean, holy crap, boys, stop fighting over her! She's not worth it!
I can't actually think of any ship I liked on that show (except for the implied Spangel). Cordy/Doyle? Mostly one-sided and he was gone too fast for me to get invested. Angel/Fred? Totally hero worship and icky. Wes/Lilah? I... kinda block that out since it was during the parts of season 4 I dislike. Cordy/Connor? No explanation needed. Lindsey/Eve? I just hate Eve, so anything that gives her more screen time is bad. Wes/Fred? Weirdly obsessive and by the time they got together, I think Wes was more in love with the idealized version of Fred he'd pined for than the actual girl. Angel/Nina? Blah. Nina was practically a non-entity.
It's funny, because although I clearly have my preferences (*cough* Spuffy), I don't have any problem with the other canon pairings on Buffy (except Willow/Kennedy), and I regularly incorporate them into my fics. But Angel, for some reason, is like pairing kryptonite to me.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 02:50 pm (UTC)I'll agree with you on the other ships on Angel. They never roped me in. Well, except for the slight Illyria/Wesley thing goign on at the end there.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 10:34 pm (UTC)Oh yeah... S6 Spuffy. And both partners were banging the crap out of each other on concurrent seasons.
Man, I wish there were more Wes/Lilah fic out there. AmyB and and
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 11:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 02:52 pm (UTC)I loved Doyle, and I've read a wonderful short fic in which he gives Cordy a really fun day at the beach that is completely the opposite of the sort of thing she thinks she likes. It made me want them to get together. :) It's sad that he was gone so quickly.
Amazing comparison of Spike to Cordy. I wouldn't have thought of it, but you're right. They have very similar relationships with Angel. Good call.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 07:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:02 pm (UTC)Buffy and Angel was never a real relationship to me. It was a first love for Buffy which was fairy tale to her. She didn't know real love for what it was. How it ended scarred her for the rest of her relationships. Riley and Spike both suffered due to her issues with trust cause by her father leaving and then Angel. Buffy and Spike was a real relationship because they tried to deal with their issues. Angel left because he couldn't deal, but Spike refused to leave even after Buffy had died. Spike was the real deal for Buffy even if she had trouble accepting it. JMHO.
Angel had mixed ideas and feelings about his relationship to Buffy. She was his chance to begin his redemption. She was an innocent to him and he treated her as such as long as he wasn't Angelus. Angel drifted for a very long time and hid away from human contact till Whistler showed him Buffy. Without that Angel might have stayed in alleys eating rats.
Angel and Cordy grew to respect and care about each other before love got in the way. Angel and Cordy had a real adult relationship where they didn't idolize who the other was. The real life pregnancy of Charisma Carpenter changed everything for the show. They had to do rewrites so we never really got to see the direction the writers had wanted to do. Season Four suffered for the rewrites.
Angel with Buffy to me never worked. Angel walked away. He thought he was doing the right thing, but he ended up making it difficult for Buffy emotionally. Angel and Cordy might have worked if real life hadn't caused a change of plans for the show.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:06 pm (UTC)I could be wrong about this, but I was under the impression that Cordy was always going to be evil in s4. The pregnancy obviously forced them to make some changes to the plot (she probably wouldn't have given birth to Jasmine, for instance), but I didn't think it changed the trajectory of Cordy's character or her relationship with Angel.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:09 pm (UTC)Poor Cordelia was put into so many 'plot' turns that destroyed her character and attraction. Cordelia and Conner - eww unwatchable!
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:31 pm (UTC)I was remembering the scene where Wesley and Cordelia "explain" Bangel to a recently rescued Fred *giggles*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 03:49 pm (UTC)Capital crime?
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:35 pm (UTC)the writers start throwing up one artificial roadblock after another, trying to come up with ways to keep them apart
I think you nailed it with "artificial roadblock" here. A lot of that stuff was superfluous and time wasting. But then, I thought that Angel & Cordy has such a solid friendship that it would be hard to come up with internal conflict for them. Not impossible, but it would have taken the show in an entirely different direction.
And I'm with you 100% on mid-s4. (I actually have a re-write for that sitting on my hard drive, awaiting tinkering.) By that time, I was SO ready for the show to go in a COMPLETELY different direction!
I guess my problem with Angel on his own show is that I feel like the writers stunted his arc artificially. Every time it looked like they were going to add to his "personal growth chart", he took another spin on the wheel of angst when it should have been a spiral. Either up or down, but not the same thing over and over!
Anyway, good meta!
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:50 pm (UTC)I actually have a re-write for that sitting on my hard drive, awaiting tinkering.
Do it! Do it!
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:39 pm (UTC)I personally loved Cordy/Angel... in theory. There was a connection between them that was more substantive than any Bangel shared (which was all about fantastical teen angst). But, as soon as the writers decided to actually pursue Cordy/Angel, rather than grow what was there between C/A they set about trying to make them Bangel when it never should have been. The whole kyrumption b.s. (or however it was spelled) was silly and ridiculous and part of some odd tendency in the Whedonverse that requires characters to be 'special' rather than letting characters just be in their own right and that be special enough. The more they tried to make the Cordy/Angel connection fantastical as opposed to their knowing/loving each other -- flaws and all -- the more the story went awry. Add in the problems the writers seemed to have with CC, and C/A, which had such potential, got derailed.
I still consider C/A to be the more true relationship though I also think that Angel maintained a more idealized and romanticized Bangel in his head.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 05:30 pm (UTC)See, this is why I enjoy Spangel, even though it was totally sexless canon-wise (what we saw of it, anyway), but it was less complicated. It cut through the bullshit. And we didn't have all that angst garbage that we all O.D.ed on anyway from everyone else. Just two guys, not holding anything back. It was more fun that way, I tells ya.
Also, Spike makes an excellent Cordelia replacement. As much as I love her character (before she became damaged goods anyway), Spike did it better--two times. And that is totally unbiased, cause I love her too.
And yes, *way* too long...
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 06:48 pm (UTC)Okay, that right there should have indicated how perfect they were for each other. Two people who can't ever have sex. Who else are they going to date but each other?
I changed my mind. I'm sold.
As much as I love her character (before she became damaged goods anyway), Spike did it better--two times.
Hmm... I don't think Spike actually did all that good a job of replacing Cordelia in Buffy. I mean, he was an excellent character in his own right, and far surpassed the role he was intended to fill, but as a Cordy replacement? Not so much. I think Anya ended up doing that, which is why they had to find other things for Spike to do (which worked out better for everyone).
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 06:00 pm (UTC)I could have liked Angel/Cordy, but I also got annoyed with it. I never had the "it's so sad" feeling, but rather the "thank god it's over feeling." All that "they never got together" stuff got on my nerves. I would have rather that they got together and had it end tragically than all this "will they, won't they, oh not another obstacle!" stuff. I hated the higher being stuff, and Connor--ick. In fact, season 4--ick. I also would have been perfectly happy for Angel and Cordy to remain friends.
I don't think I got invested in any of the ships on Angel, either. I like Willow/Oz, Willow/Tara, Xander/Anya, even Xander/Cordy, but no pairing on Angel actually got me invested, where I was sad when they split. Though I did hope that Fred would get with Wes, the triangle seemed way overdone.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 06:50 pm (UTC)And for the rest of what you said, ITA! :)
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 07:10 pm (UTC)Loved Cordelia but meh, they tried to make her all earth mother - preferred Angel/Cordy back when she was still cool.
There again I quite liked Eve too so I was in the minority thar.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 07:21 pm (UTC)You liked Eve? *defriends*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 08:48 pm (UTC)I don't think writers tried to imitate Bangel; my impression is quite the contrary, that they tried to build all subsequent Buffy and Angel ships as an antithesis to BA.
I think that the main problem here is that BtVS is a show about love - hence, internal conflicts and personal issues. While AtS is a show about fighting - hence "artificial roadblocks" that characters have to fight.
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2008 09:01 pm (UTC)I don't think a show about fighting necessarily precludes internal conflict. I mean, isn't the central conflict of the show Angel's constant struggle against his darker nature? Isn't his main motivation a quest for redemption? That's all internal. I think if they'd tried, they could've found a way to fit internal C/A conflict into the fighting theme.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 16th, 2008 12:34 am (UTC)Cause, man, it's Cordelia. I cannot imagine one second of time where she'd seriously consider it, because she'd feel that she'd *always* be second-best in his heart.
Pretty much agree with you on the other ships you mentioned. Of course, you left out my favorites-Lindsey/Angel, Angel/Darla, Darla/Lindsey and *G* Angel/Darla/Lindsey.
no subject
Date: Aug. 16th, 2008 12:56 am (UTC)But now that you mention it, I think that would've been an interesting angle to pursue with their relationship. You can't really help who you crush on, but you can choose not to do anything about it. What if Cordelia had refused to get involved, despite their obvious feelings for each other, because she did think she was second-best to him? And then Angel'd have to prove that she wasn't. That'd create some angst. Beats the higher power thing, at any rate.
As for the other ships... Angel/Lindsey I didn't even consider, because I don't buy that ever happening. I did forget all about Darla, and I liked Angel/Darla, although they're about 90% fucked up, lol. Not really a fan of Lindsey/Darla...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 16th, 2008 01:02 am (UTC)*disclaimer* total, raging C/A shipper here. :D
Anyway, I sort of agree with you. I thought they were doing really great with the subtext bewteen the two of them, the growing friendship that was deepening into romantic love over time, until Fred started spouting off about Moira and crap. The C/A ship has never needed to be destined (in fact, I can't think of a ship less destined), never needed to be about two larger than life souls who 'recognize' each other.
Up until then, it was about two adults alone in the world who found each other. The writers could have dealt with problems like Angel's relationship issues, Cordy's desire not to bring Angelus back into the mix, Cordy's visions eating her up inside and her need to bear the visions for sake of being needed, Angel's need to make unilateral decisions for the group without consulting anyone. Connor's origins with Cordelia being cautious and not so accepting of him (given her experience with demonic pregnancies), and Angel's need to believe his son was good above any evidence to the contrary. Anything other than throwing up such superficial obstacles like Groo and amnesia.
*breathes*
And I have to wonder if Cordy and Spike are so much alike in their relationship with Angel, then why is shipping Spike with him so much more accepted than shipping Cordelia with him?
This is a rhetorical question, meant for the writers of the show, because really? Do you need any more evidence that Spike was brought on to be Angel's leading lady than the season 5 dvd box cover?
no subject
Date: Aug. 16th, 2008 01:17 am (UTC)Exactly! Now see, I think that's when I began actively disliking the Cordy/Angel thing. It felt unnatural and forced to me.
then why is shipping Spike with him so much more accepted than shipping Cordelia with him?
Keeping in mind that I'm not much on Spangel either...I think perhaps that would be because Angel and Spike had such a long history together and they had love for Buffy in common.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 12:24 am (UTC)Also, I don't think B/A was especially teenaged or idealistic, Angel realized he should live in her honor when she died. Buffy knew she couldn't have forever with Angel but was able to take comfort in what she could have after her Mom died, they had their moments of melodrama but I generally don't have that view of the pairing.
no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 01:49 pm (UTC)The reason I see Bangel as teenaged and idealistic is because they both seem more in love with the idea of each other than actually in love. Especially for Buffy - everyone thinks they're madly in love and they've found their soulmate at seventeen, but it's rarely true. And Angel has put her up on a pedestal because she's pure and good and everything he's not. They don't see each other - they see idealized versions of each other, which they can never live up to. I think most of the time, they bring out the worst in each other, and once they start acting like adults (like the moments you mentioned), it's pretty much the death knell for their relationship.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 11:48 am (UTC)Kudos.
no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 02:11 pm (UTC)I found your post through a newsletter; it was interesting to read because I both agreed with you and violently disagreed with you ;)
I'm a Cordy/Angel fan. It's my favourite pairing from the entire Buffyverse, partly because Cordy & Angel are two of my three favourite characters (the other being Anya), and partly because I love relationships that are based in friendship. That's why I don't support pairings like Buffy/Angel (all passion no friendship) or pre-soul Spike/Buffy (where Buffy didn't even like him), but do quite like, for instance, Willow/Tara, where they always seemed to be good friends as well as lovers, and even have a certain fondness for Angel/Nina as two friends with a slight attraction for each other having a realistic and temporary relationship.
So I disagree with you over my opinion of the *concept* of the Angel/Cordelia romance, but I agree with you completely over the *way* that it was written. The constant, constant obstacles in their way - even Buffy & Angel managed to have a while together before having to break up; Cordy and Angel never managed to get a single kiss until seconds before she died. Why do TV people think that a relationship can't be interesting unless it's 99% angst?
When I get my craving for Cordy/Angel, I'm more likely to turn to fanfiction than my DVDs, because really, what episode could I turn to that wouldn't depress me?
I don't think that all TV friendships should turn into relationships, by any means. But I do think that any good relationship should actually involve the two participants being friends... and that's why I'm glad that B/A, as passionate as it was, and as much chemistry as they had, was over before Buffy graduated. It really would never have worked.
no subject
Date: Aug. 17th, 2008 09:47 pm (UTC)Hmm... I'd certainly agree with that in real life, but I think for the most part, that doesn't make for particularly interesting TV. A relationship doesn't need to be 99% angst, but it DOES need to have drama, if people are going to continue to tune in every week. If the two people are really good friends, they probably don't have a lot of conflict - or at least, less than a couple that's all about the passion.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Oct. 6th, 2009 10:17 pm (UTC)But word to all that.
The pairings in AtS drive me up the wall. I liked what Angel/Cordy could have been, but I got so frustrated with the non-execution of it, that I'm left just shrugging and going "Meh". And...um...I violently loathed Gunn/Fred/Wesley, with a special heap of special seething hatred for Fred/Wesley which squicks me to hell and back.
Though I'm attempting to keep an open mind on my rewatch to see if I like them better...heh...(I didn't say I was making a good attempt at it).
no subject
Date: Oct. 7th, 2009 02:36 am (UTC)