More Lost thoughts
Aug. 13th, 2010 08:31 pmI've now watched through episode nine. So far I love Hurley and Sayid, hate Sawyer, think Jin's a dick and feel bad for Sun, and have diagnosed Jack with a serious hero complex (okay, I did that in the first five minutes). Oh, and Locke's a major weirdo. I was also rather unconvinced that Kate is as dangerous as they tried to make her seem in the beginning there. Like, what exactly is she going to do? The US Marshal dude is all, [srs voice] "She will do anything to get away." Get away from WHAT? They're on a DESERTED ISLAND. It's not like they're going to lock her up in jungle jail, so I'm glad they've kind of dropped the whole "Kate's so ~dangerous~" angle. Personally, I'd be more worried about asshole Sawyer hogging all the supplies and picking fights with people.
I am trying very hard not to think that anything means anything, because I know that way leads to madness, but I can really see why people got all fanatical about that kind of stuff. If I'd been watching it as it aired, without the benefit of knowing that it's complete and utter lunacy to try, I'd probably be writing essays about all kinds of thematic and symbolic shit.
I will say, though, that I am enjoying the story qua story. I like the way they are handling the flashbacks, and the character development seems to complement the tension from everyone keeping secrets and all the scary shit on the island (seriously, there sure are plenty of ways to die on that island, aren't there? It's a freakin' death trap).
I am trying very hard not to think that anything means anything, because I know that way leads to madness, but I can really see why people got all fanatical about that kind of stuff. If I'd been watching it as it aired, without the benefit of knowing that it's complete and utter lunacy to try, I'd probably be writing essays about all kinds of thematic and symbolic shit.
I will say, though, that I am enjoying the story qua story. I like the way they are handling the flashbacks, and the character development seems to complement the tension from everyone keeping secrets and all the scary shit on the island (seriously, there sure are plenty of ways to die on that island, aren't there? It's a freakin' death trap).
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 01:27 am (UTC)Hurley is always love.
Sayid is always kick-ass.
I'm willing to bet that Jin will change your mind eventually. (Jin/Sun = love!)
And Kate the dangerous criminal... was never believable.
And, yeah, the island is a big ol' death trap so lots of characters do in a variety of ways.
Actually, I take that back, it's not just a death trap. It's more that the island doesn't give a damn if someone dies...or rather most someones. There are a handful that it won't let die. At least not until it's darn ready to let them do so).
Personally, I know I'm in the realitively satisfied group, but I honestly think that most things are explained. Not everything. There are a couple of big things that are never explained (except... damn you Lost -- hee! -- with the DVD extra that was leaked, it looks like one and a half of lingering dangling plot threads is answered in the DVD extra (which is a 30 minute epilogue to the finale involving at least 4 of the characters... which means I've got to see it) At any rate, while granting that there are indead some dangling threads, I think that most of the stuff had answers.
Polar bears? Answered. Smoke monster? Also answered. Why no one found the island? Answered. The island 'whispers'? Answered. Now, granted, some answers boil down to "fate" and/or "magic" but, I thought there were answers. And, honestly, if the question is about some tertiary character and/or red shirt, it may have fallen by the wayside (especially if the character happened to have died somewhere along the way). Oh, and if the question is "Where did Jack get his tattoo?" Grant that you never wanted it answered and skip that episode. It was pointless. No one cared!
There are thematic things going on (I believe). The whole story is about redemption. All of the survivors are damaged goods. They all have things they must be redeemed from. They all were -- in one way or another -- on the wrong path. But it's still free will... or fate. Actually the free will/fate debate is endlessly debateable. Develop your own opinion which most applies. But the survivors have the chance to be their better selves and to find redemption. Whether or not they do so is always part of the story.
I do agree with others that it's better to focus on the characters the emotion, because when push came to shove, the writers tended to choose sentiment over sense. But, frankly, that's actually one of the things I liked. I mean, if in the end they chose character love over plot, it's better to be given the sweet end of the lollipop rather than the fuzzy one, even if it meant sacrificing sense and occasionally going with "It's magic!" :)
I will say that Lost loves its starcrossed lovers because it has several pairs of them. :)
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 04:37 am (UTC)But it was fun to watch. Not sorry I did. When the DVD comes out I'm counting on *you* to spill the extra info!!
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 09:33 am (UTC)I was happy with Sayid, finally an Arab character who's likable and Iraqi nonetheless. Though being half-Arabian, I can't stop laughing when he starts speaking formal Arabic, and a very bad one. Nobody speaks like that. There are dialects and accents, and formal Arabic is just used in writing. The funniest part though is when Sayid prays, so many mistakes. I'm actually shocked they didn't bother to bring someone who's Arab and Muslim to help them with that -it may not be a problem to a non-Arab viewer, but it always ruined the scenes for me and my family, we never got into them and we always wish Sayid sticks with English.
I'm curious about what you think of Charlie, Clair, Michael, his son, the blonde and her brother -forgot their names.
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 09:37 am (UTC)*is mind boggled and clearly loves my Sawyer*
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 03:08 pm (UTC)Ooh, I think I could like that. Otherwise, I can see how it might get irritating.
I'm willing to bet that Jin will change your mind eventually. (Jin/Sun = love!)
Yeah, based on what I've absorbed from fans about some of the characters, I imagine things will change drastically from my first impressions. We'll see if they win me over, but right now I'm kind of thinking Sun should ditch her husband and go hang out with Michael. :)
It's more that the island doesn't give a damn if someone dies...or rather most someones. There are a handful that it won't let die. At least not until it's darn ready to let them do so).
....That would make the island sentient....
There are thematic things going on (I believe).
So far, the only things I'd really identified are a conflict between light and dark (e.g. Locke's backgammon), lots of talk about what characters can and can't do, and "everybody deserves a fresh start," which is sort of related to redemption, I guess. Also, I don't know if there's a point to naming multiple characters after philosophers, or if that's just to fuck with people. :)
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 03:18 pm (UTC)Oh, yeah, definitely. If only from the number of fans who absolutely adore him, I'd say there's a redemption are coming up. And it actually did make me think of Spike, except there's one major difference - I always loved him. He didn't go from a character I hated to a character I loved. I loved him when he was evil, and I loved him when he was good. Whereas with Sawyer I actually legitimately hate him and want to smack the smirk off his face every time he's on camera.
I'm curious about what you think of Charlie, Clair, Michael, his son, the blonde and her brother -forgot their names.
Uh, let's see... of those, Charlie's the only one whose backstory I've seen. I like him, but his character isn't especially interesting to me the way some of the others are. That's really the same for the others as well. They haven't done anything to make me dislike them yet, but they also haven't made me love them, either. Oh, and I still can't shake the feeling that Shannon and Boone (the brother and sister) dropped in from some CW show, lol.
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 07:23 pm (UTC)(Jin gets way better too, IMO).
Sayid and Hurley, OTOH, are always, always love. Just, the best. God, Sayid, especially. I just love everything about his set-up and characterization. Jack is annoying, though.
(*already can't wait for you to get to the second season, because that's when my two favorite characters are introduced*)
The flashbacks are really cool, and they go super-interesting places with them as a structuring device. It's one of the best things about Lost, IMO.
no subject
Date: Aug. 14th, 2010 11:57 pm (UTC)Did I imply that? ::whistling innocently::
Well, you know it's... No, actually it's really... Hmm
The truth is that it's kind of confusing. ;)
So far, the only things I'd really identified are a conflict between light and dark (e.g. Locke's backgammon),
That's also true and yet nothing is actually black and white. And the backgammon thing will arise a few time.
Also, I don't know if there's a point to naming multiple characters after philosophers, or if that's just to fuck with people. :)
Heh. They spent years playing with character names that way. :)
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 12:00 am (UTC)I have always known that it wasn't a normal island or a simple plane crash, though - another thing I picked up through osmosis, so it's not like I wasn't expecting weird shit like a sentient island. :)
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 12:02 am (UTC)Hee, this is going to sound wierd (because it is) but I think his nadir is when he killed a tree frog. Given all the people that are killed, it's bizarre. But I really hated him when he killed the tree frog!
no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 15th, 2010 05:11 am (UTC)